Fifty years after Britain left, many African judges still wear wigs

A half a century after the British gave up their last colonies in Africa, one of the most glaring symbols of colonialism remains: the traditional wig. The long, white, horsehair locks are still worn by African judges and lawyers today, a tradition that the British themselves have partly given up.

 

Now, a new generation of African jurists is asking: Why are relics of the colonial courtroom still prominent today?

 

The wigs date back to the 1600s, during the reign of Charles II, when they became a symbol of the British judicial system.

 

An investigation found that a wig could cost up to $6,500 today. Increasingly, opponents of the attire aren’t just arguing against costs and inconvenience — one editor wrote that wigs weren’t made for the sweltering heat — but against a tradition that African judiciaries appear to be embracing.

 

Defenders of the attire argue that they represent more than a British tradition, but something that distinguishes the country’s judges. In Kenya, many see the wigs and robes as their uniforms, items that elevate a courtroom, despite — or because of — their colonial links.

 

While many leaders, like former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, have denounced the West for what he calls a “neo-colonial attitude,” many continue to cling to this dress code while political pressure across the continent to end this tradition continues to grow.

 

Click here to read the full story.

 

(Photo Credit: AP Photo/Tsvangirayi Mukwazhi)

 


Comments are closed.